Thread safety of the PSA subsystem#

Requirements#

Backward compatibility requirement#

Code that is currently working must keep working. There can be an exception for code that uses features that are advertised as experimental; for example, it would be annoying but ok to add extra requirements for drivers.

(In this section, “currently” means Mbed TLS releases without proper concurrency management: 3.0.0, 3.1.0, and any other subsequent 3.x version.)

In particular, if you either protect all PSA calls with a mutex, or only ever call PSA functions from a single thread, your application currently works and must keep working. If your application currently builds and works with MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_C and MBEDTLS_THREADING_C enabled, it must keep building and working.

As a consequence, we must not add a new platform requirement beyond mutexes for the base case. It would be ok to add new platform requirements if they're only needed for PSA drivers, or if they're only performance improvements.

Tempting platform requirements that we cannot add to the default MBEDTLS_THREADING_C include:

• Releasing a mutex from a different thread than the one that acquired it. This isn't even guaranteed to work with pthreads.

• New primitives such as semaphores or condition variables.

Correctness out of the box#

If you build with MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_C and MBEDTLS_THREADING_C, the code must be functionally correct: no race conditions, deadlocks or livelocks.

The PSA Crypto API specification defines minimum expectations for concurrent calls. They must work as if they had been executed one at a time, except that the following cases have undefined behavior:

• Destroying a key while it's in use.

• Concurrent calls using the same operation object. (An operation object may not be used by more than one thread at a time. But it can move from one thread to another between calls.)

• Overlap of an output buffer with an input or output of a concurrent call.

• Modification of an input buffer during a call.

Note that while the specification does not define the behavior in such cases, Mbed TLS can be used as a crypto service. It's acceptable if an application can mess itself up, but it is not acceptable if an application can mess up the crypto service. As a consequence, destroying a key while it's in use may violate the security property that all key material is erased as soon as psa_destroy_key returns, but it may not cause data corruption or read-after-free inside the key store.

No spinning#

The code must not spin on a potentially non-blocking task. For example, this is proscribed:

lock(m);
while (!its_my_turn) {
    unlock(m);
    lock(m);
}

Rationale: this can cause battery drain, and can even be a livelock (spinning forever), e.g. if the thread that might unblock this one has a lower priority.

Driver requirements#

At the time of writing, the driver interface specification does not consider multithreaded environments.

We need to define clear policies so that driver implementers know what to expect. Here are two possible policies at two ends of the spectrum; what is desirable is probably somewhere in between.

• Driver entry points may be called concurrently from multiple threads, even if they're using the same key, and even including destroying a key while an operation is in progress on it.

• At most one driver entry point is active at any given time.

A more reasonable policy could be:

• By default, each driver only has at most one entry point active at any given time. In other words, each driver has its own exclusive lock.

• Drivers have an optional "thread_safe" boolean property. If true, it allows concurrent calls to this driver.

• Even with a thread-safe driver, the core never starts the destruction of a key while there are operations in progress on it, and never performs concurrent calls on the same multipart operation.

Long-term performance requirements#

In the short term, correctness is the important thing. We can start with a global lock.

In the medium to long term, performing a slow or blocking operation (for example, a driver call, or an RSA decryption) should not block other threads, even if they're calling the same driver or using the same key object.

We may want to go directly to a more sophisticated approach because when a system works with a global lock, it's typically hard to get rid of it to get more fine-grained concurrency.

Key destruction long-term requirements#

As noted above in “Correctness out of the box”, when a key is destroyed, it's ok if psa_destroy_key allows copies of the key to live until ongoing operations using the key return. In the long term, it would be good to guarantee that psa_destroy_key wipes all copies of the key material.

Resources left to protect#

Analysis of the behavior of the PSA key store as of Mbed TLS 9202ba37b19d3ea25c8451fd8597fce69eaa6867, reduced by items protected by PR https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/pull/5673.

Global variables#

• psa_crypto::global_data.rng: depends on the RNG implementation. See “Random generator”.

  • psa_generate_random: query.

  • mbedtls_psa_crypto_configure_entropy_sources (only if MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG is enabled): setup. Only called from psa_crypto_init via mbedtls_psa_random_init, or from test code.

  • mbedtls_psa_crypto_free: deinit.

  • psa_crypto_init: seed (via mbedtls_psa_random_seed); setup via `mbedtls_psa_crypto_configure_entropy_sources.

• psa_crypto::global_data.{initialized,rng_state}: these are bit-fields and cannot be modified independently so they must be protected by the same mutex. The following functions access these fields:

  • mbedtls_psa_crypto_configure_entropy_sources [rng_state] (only if MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG is enabled): read. Only called from psa_crypto_init via mbedtls_psa_random_init, or from test code.

  • mbedtls_psa_crypto_free: modification.

  • psa_crypto_init: modification.

  • Many functions via GUARD_MODULE_INITIALIZED: read.

Random generator#

The PSA RNG can be accessed both from various PSA functions, and from application code via mbedtls_psa_get_random.

With the built-in RNG implementations using mbedtls_ctr_drbg_context or mbedtls_hmac_drbg_context, querying the RNG with mbedtls_xxx_drbg_random() is thread-safe (protected by a mutex inside the RNG implementation), but other operations (init, free, seed) are not.

When MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG is enabled, thread safety depends on the implementation.

Driver resources#

Depends on the driver. The PSA driver interface specification does not discuss whether drivers must support concurrent calls.

Proposed strategy#

Slot states#

Each key slot can be in one of the following states:

PSA_STATE_EMPTY,     /* No key loaded yet. */
PSA_STATE_CREATING,  /* Key creation has been started. */
PSA_STATE_UNUSED,    /* Key present, but unused. */
PSA_STATE_READING,   /* Key material used in an operation. */
PSA_STATE_WIPING,    /* Purging key data from memory in progress. */
PSA_STATE_DESTROYING /* Persistent and volatile key material destruction in progress. */

A high-level view of state transitions#

           ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐
      ┌────┤  EMPTY   ◄──┤DESTROYING│
      │    └─┬────┬──▲┘  └──▲──▲────┘
┌─────▼────┐ │ ┌──▼──┴────┐ │  │
│ CREATING │ │ │  WIPING  ├─┘  │
└──┬─┬─────┘ │ └──────▲───┘    │
   │ │  ┌────▼─────┐  ├────────┘
   │ └──►  UNUSED  ├──┤
   │    └──▲────┬──┘  │
   │  ┌─┬──┴────▼──┐  │
   │  └─► READING  ├──┤
   │    └──────────┘  │
   └──────────────────┘

Details on state transitions#

State transitions from:Empty state: -> Wiping: cleaning slots in psa_wipe_all_key_slots: psa_crypto_init. -> Unused: importing an existing key that does not require creation: psa_load_persistent_key_into_slot, psa_load_builtin_key_into_slot. -> Creating: psa_import_key, psa_copy_key, psa_key_derivation_output_key, psa_generate_key.

Creating state: -> Wiping: psa_fail_key_creation. -> Destroying: UNUSED; TODO - could/should it happen? -> Unused: psa_finish_key_creation from psa_import_key, psa_copy_key, psa_key_derivation_output_key, psa_generate_key.

Unused state: -> Reading: Any operation that needs to read the key material. Copying, exporting, signing, verifying, enc/dec... via psa_get_and_lock_key_slot_with_policy. -> Wiping: psa_purge_key, psa_close_key, but also psa_get_empty_key_slot if there's an unused persistent key. -> Destroying: psa_destroy_key.

Reading state: -> Reading: another reader added via psa_get_and_lock_key_slot_with_policy. -> Unused: psa_unlock_key_slot by the last reader. -> Wiping: psa_purge_key, psa_close_key; -> Destroying: psa_destroy_key.

Wiping state: -> Destroying: psa_destroy_key. -> Empty: psa_wipe_key from psa_close_key, psa_purge_key, but also delayed wiping when the last reader is unlocked in psa_unlock_key_slot. Failures in psa_get_and_lock_key_slot, psa_get_empty_key_slot.

Destroying state: -> Empty: psa_finish_key_destruction (also calls psa_wipe_key), psa_destroy_key if there are no readers, and if there was - unlocking the last one via psa_unlock_key_slot.

Implementation details#

The key slot data and metadata are protected by a single, global mutex. Each change of data/metadata and each read of a slot state requires locking it. Please note, however, that reading the key data itself does not have to be guarded by a mutex, given that psa_get_and_lock_key_slot is called prior to it. This function will lock the mutex, transition the key slot to the PSA_STATE_READING state, increase the reader counter, and release the mutex. This guarantees that the key slot data/metadata (apart from the reader counter) will not be modified until the last reader unlocks the slot by calling psa_unlock_key_slot.

Intent reasoning#

To be able to atomically get a key slot and move it to a desired state (or add a reader), a new concept called intent was added to psa_get_and_lock_key_slot calls. Possible intents:

• Read - used widely for all operations that read key slot data, moves the key to PSA_STATE_READING and adds a reader;

• Destroy - get key slot and move it to PSA_STATE_DESTROYING state;

• Open - to provide functionality for the to-be-deprecated psa_open_key, which gets the key handle but does not change its state.

Destroying / wiping a key in use#

If there is a request for key destruction / wiping while the key is in use (PSA_STATE_READING), the state will change to PSA_STATE_DESTROYING or PSA_STATE_WIPING, but the call will return PSA_ERROR_DELAYED. The operation itself will be performed once the last of readers unlocks the slot.

Transitioning to the same state twice#

Apart from the possible transition from PSA_STATE_READING to itself (when adding a new reader), it is not possible to transition to the same state. The reason behind this is to prevent double calls to slot creation, destruction, or wiping.